CNIPA Campaign against Bad Faith Trademark Filers

East IP

On March 24, 2021, the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration (“CNIPA”) published an Action Plan for Combatting Bad Faith Trademark Registration (“Action Plan”).

The Action Plan is effectively a nine-month campaign that aims to identify and penalize bad faith filers and trademark agencies with the aim of creating deterrence against a range of behaviors and bringing the problem to heel.

The campaign appears intended in part to more effectively implement provisions in the PRC Trademark Law and related implementing regulations issued in late-2019.

The new campaign covers a wide range of behaviors, including the following:

  • “Bad faith registration of third party trademarks or other commercial markings that have a relatively high reputation or have strong distinctiveness, damaging the prior rights and interests of others.”
  • “Bad faith registration of the names of public figures, well-known works or character names with a high reputation.”(NB: This seems to refer to movies / TV series and the names of characters appearing in such works).

While many bad faith filers are warehousers that tend to file for huge numbers of trademarks for the purpose of resale, the CNIPA announcement indicates that this phenomenon will be the subject of a separate initiative that has not yet been disclosed.

To achieve its aims, CNIPA is planning “precision strikes” around the entire process of trademark registration. While not explicitly stated, we suspect this will mean the creation of an internal black-list.

The action plan sets out a number of new, as well as existing, measures that will be deployed against bad faith marks. These include:

  • Adoption of a “rapid rejection mechanism” where bad faith applications have been identified (i.e., fast-tracking decisions against bad faith filings, oppositions or invalidations);
  • Consolidation of related cases;
  • Imposition “social credit” penalties against bad faith actors, including through insertion of their names into the national public credit database; and
  • Administrative fines as permitted under the 2019 amendments to the Trademark Law and implementing regulations thereto.

Among the above measures, the acceleration and consolidation of related cases may well generate significant cost savings for victim brand owners.

CNIPA has not clarified how victims of piracy can report their cases and maximize the chances they will be acted upon. However, it is likely that CNIPA will consider reports from victim brand owners and industry associations acting on their behalf. Just how many reports CNIPA will be willing to act upon remains unclear.

CNIPA is planning to publicize “typical cases” throughout 2021 with the aim of naming and shaming pirates and their trademark agencies.

After completion of the campaign in December 2021, CNIPA will presumably continue to deal with bad faith filers and trademark agencies in a more normalized manner.

搜索

Most Read

Related Insights

近日,由EastIP/东权律师事务所蒋强律师代理的美盛农资(北京)有限公司(以下简称“美盛农资”)商标侵权及不正当竞争纠纷案一审胜诉。...
原告系美国知名设计师与艺术家,以其独特的黑白马克笔绘画风格闻名。近年来与国际一线大品牌合作,其设计作品具有较高的艺术及经济价值。...
新法将于2025年10月15日生效。新法引入了一系列对市场经营活动有广泛影响的的修订内容,包括最为引人注意的涉及数据权益保护、线上经营活动、商业秘密的相关条款。下文主要着眼于与商标和其他知识产权权利人最为息息相关的条文,包括涉及平台责任、混淆行为以及长臂管辖的相关内容。