Trademark Prosecution – Pre-action Mediation of Administrative Appeals

East IP

In August 2021, the Beijing IP Court (BIPC) issued a Notice (available here) that provides for potential pre-action mediation of administrative appeal cases involving application appeals. Depending on how it is implemented, it may well help to reduce costs and the time required for such cases.

Such mediations take place between the applicant and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Division and ideally will provide a means of suspending review of the mediated cases until co-pending disputes or appeals are finally decided.

Regrettably, it appears the BIPC still requires that non-Chinese applicants present a legalized POA package before it will consider proposing mediation.

The BIPC gave the following examples of conditions under which BIPC may allow mediations:

  1. The case turns only on the status of the cited mark and the parties acknowledge the determination of the status; and
  2. The determination of the facts in a case is not sufficiently comprehensive, causing a party to file a lawsuit. Once the facts can be determined, the case can be swiftly resolved.

In practice, typical cases that generally meet these conditions include cases where:

  1. The cited mark has been cancelled for non-use, invalidation or opposition or is pending cancellation; and
  2. The cited mark and the applied-for mark effectively belong to the same proprietor (and an assignment is presumably in progress).Media reports indicate that the BIPC will issue implementing rules in due course to further clarify the types of cases that it views as eligible for notices to mediate.  The BIPC has reportedly issued around 300 such notices thus far.

搜索

Most Read

Related Insights

近日,由EastIP/东权律师事务所蒋强律师代理的美盛农资(北京)有限公司(以下简称“美盛农资”)商标侵权及不正当竞争纠纷案一审胜诉。...
原告系美国知名设计师与艺术家,以其独特的黑白马克笔绘画风格闻名。近年来与国际一线大品牌合作,其设计作品具有较高的艺术及经济价值。...
新法将于2025年10月15日生效。新法引入了一系列对市场经营活动有广泛影响的的修订内容,包括最为引人注意的涉及数据权益保护、线上经营活动、商业秘密的相关条款。下文主要着眼于与商标和其他知识产权权利人最为息息相关的条文,包括涉及平台责任、混淆行为以及长臂管辖的相关内容。